Transcript: Hot D mid-seasonish update

This is a transcript of (the scripted portion of) my latest podcast episode, in which I discuss House of the Dragon up to episode six.

A quick content note before we begin: I’ll be discussing themes present in the show such as incest, sexual coercion, and violence against queer characters. I’ll also be discussing the plot of House of the Dragon up to episode six, and there’s a minor spoiler for Rings of Power episode three. I’ll also mention some character deaths in The Magicians and The 100, because I’ll be discussing the ‘Bury Your Gays’ trope. Okay, on with the show!

When last we met—unless you listened to my chaotic Mubi episode—I had said that I was going to continue watching both Rings of Power and House of the Dragon. That did not last long. I managed to get through the third Rings of Power episode, but only just, and I had to admit to myself that I really wasn’t enjoying this show. The third episode didn’t even have Bronwen in it! I was still kind of invested in the Harfoot storyline, and I love the dwarves though I didn’t really care about their actual plotline so far, but other than that it was not hitting for me at all. The line that actually turned me off the most was when Galadriel told Halbrand that he “chafed under the rags of the common”. I mean, Hot D has a hereditary monarchy, sure, but I don’t think it’s buying into concepts like birthright. The central thesis behind Game of Thrones has always been that power goes to the person who can play the game the best—unless you count season eight, which, let’s not. I mean, House of the Dragon explicitly tells us that inbreeding and hoarding weapons are the way that the Targs cling to power, and I don’t think it’s condoning those practices, even though Daemyra is totally hot.

Yes, I have fallen deeply into the House of the Dragon rabbit hole, so much so that I briefly started haunting the subreddit. I’ve left it now because someone was mean to me, and I know, someone on reddit being a dickhead is not headline news, but it bummed me out. Actually I think there was an influx of new members as the show increased in popularity, and the quality control really went downhill. There’d be like two posts a day where someone would say “Am I the only one who doesn’t like Daemon?” and then there’d be a bullet pointed list of all the bad things he’d done, like his character introduction wasn’t him cutting off a guy’s balls. Yeah, dude, he’s not supposed to be a nice guy! It’s like if you were in the Hannibal fandom—which I was—and had to deal with constantly being reminded that Hannibal is actually really problematic. Bullet point one: he eats people.

Anyway, I’m off the subreddit now, but for a brief window there was actually a lot of really interesting conversation happening. After episode three, there was a lot of discussion about whether Rhaenyra sleeping with Criston could be considered sexual coercion. It got quite heated, but a lot of people had nuanced and thoughtful takes. I have to say that at the time I was on the fence about it, and honestly much less invested in their dynamic than I was in the preceding scenes with Daemon, but given Criston’s subsequent behaviour in episode five, I think it actually does make a lot of sense to read him as not being entirely consenting in that scene. It’s obvious that in his ill-advised proposal to Rhaenyra, he was bargaining to try and find a way that he could incorporate what had happened into his self-concept, and when that fell apart he couldn’t handle it. You can read it as someone who read too much into casual sex, of course, but I think that his talk about honour makes it clear that this is less about any feelings for Rhaenyra and more about his own sense of self being threatened. To me, all of that is consistent with a reading of his sex scene with Rhaenyra being coercive.

On the other hand, I did notice a lot of chatter about Alicent that I felt was uncharitable and probably misogynistic in origin—I know, shocker, on reddit. I do also think a lot of that was from book readers who were letting what happens later—which I’m patchy on—colour their perceptions of the character as written on the show. It’s so obvious that Alicent has no choice or agency in marrying Viserys, to the point where she’s developed an excoriation disorder due to her anxiety around it. It was definitely interesting to see the double standards at play there, especially when a lot of people pointing to the Criston scene as being an example of sexual coercion were accusing anyone who disagreed with them of having double standards.

One more thing that I picked up from the subreddit before I fled was a very interesting observation about Mellos. Someone pointed out a look between two of the female attendants in episode one when Mellos tells Viserys that Aemma is breached and they’ve “tried everything”, and he also seems resistant to the idea of cauterisation for Viserys’ wounds later in the episode. In episode five he has another disagreement with one of his attending staff about whether to use poultices or leeches. And, of course, he brings Rhaenyra the moon tea at the end of episode four. While I’d noticed most of this, I had put it down to Mellos being stuck in his ways rather than actively plotting, but now that it’s been pointed out to me I do think that he might well have a bias towards the Hightowers and there’s something going on with this guy.

I’d also like to touch on the death of Joffrey Lonmouth in episode five. A lot of people have pointed to this as an example of ‘Bury Your Gays’. Of course, this is hard to argue with factually, and of course the emotional response some people are having to that it completely valid, but I want to explain why for me personally it wasn’t a major issue. For me, how much the death of a queer character bothers me is based on two factors: first of all, how major a character are they, and second of all, how common is permadeath on the show. So for example, while I know a lot of people were deeply upset by the death of Lexa on The 100, I have to say that I had a different reaction to it. Lexa was a relatively new character, and it was a show where major characters died all the time. Lexa wasn’t even the first of Clarke’s love interests to die on the show, let alone the first recurring character. I also felt it was pretty obvious that they were setting up her character coming back in the City of Light, which is indeed what ended up happening. Again, this isn’t to invalidate anyone else’s feelings about it, just to express my own.

A queer character death that I really was upset about was that of Quentin Coldwater on The Magicians, for a lot of reasons. This wasn’t a minor character, it was the protagonist of the show; a character whose mental illness was not only textual but was a key part of his character introduction and arc; a character whose bisexuality had fairly recently been revealed. Major characters had died on the show before, but in both cases they’d been brought back in one way or another. The thing, I think, that bothered me the most about it was that there had been a whole episode about how the show wanted to move beyond the white male protagonist and tell more diverse stories… but there was nothing stopping them from doing that without killing off a mentally ill queer character who was part of a same sex relationship, though the writers seemed to kind of forget about that. Also, the other major queer character in the show was pretty much completely sidelined for almost that entire season, because he was possessed by a monster, which was not even the first time the show had had a queer relationship break down because someone was possessed by a monster. There also was seemingly a lot of behind the scenes bullshit where most of the cast were not told that Jason Ralph was leaving, and they filmed a fake ending, and then season five—which I didn’t watch—was apparently written for spite? Listen, I don’t want to go off the rails here.

The point is, Joffrey Lonmouth was a very minor character who had only just been introduced. In terms of screen time, he’d only had slightly more than the guy who got stepped on by Caraxes a few episodes ago. It’s also a show where minor characters get offed very, very frequently. Particularly in light of the character deaths in episode six of major and beloved characters, two of whom have been around since the first episode, Joffrey’s death seems like kind of a drop in the bucket. Also, this is a Game of Thrones spin-off! Game of Thrones was notorious for killing off characters that people had got attached to. Famously, everyone was fair game. While of course I would like there to be more queer characters on TV who don’t die, I don’t really think this is the franchise to look to for that. Unlike The Magicians, which seemingly had a whole episode congratulating itself for the fact that was about to kill off its neurodivergent queer protagonist before he could even say goodbye to his monster-possessed soulmate, Game of Thrones and House of the Dragon have never billed themselves as being unproblematic bastions of positive representation. They’ve always been brutal shows full of death and incest, and while I’m not saying that insulates them from criticism by any means, and I have had major problems with Game of Thrones myself, in this instance I think that what happened was consistent with the tone of the show. Also, Laenor does now have another lover who at time of recording is still alive, so we actually still have the same number of queer characters in the show as we did before, and this one has already had almost as much to do as Joffrey ever did. But that’s just my take!

Okay, let’s move on to episode six, which comes after a major time jump and a big cast shake-up. The fantastic Milly Alcock and Emily Carey have been replaced by Emma D’Arcy and Olivia Cooke; Theo Nate has been replaced by John Macmillan, and Savannah Steyn, who was only in one episode, has been replaced by Nanna Blondell, who… was also only in one episode.

Let’s start with Blondell. I have to say that, while the emotion of her performance was great, I was a bit thrown off by the fact that her accent was so different than what had already been established of Laena in previous episodes. As much as I love Peter Dinklage, I always had a similar problem with him, as he was the only major Game of Thrones cast member whose accent was truly terrible. Nikolaj Coster-Waldau’s was actually pretty solid, and he doesn’t even have English as a first language. I also thought that what we saw of Savannah Steyn in episode five was excellent, and it was a shame to lose her so soon. That said, I was NOT prepared for Laena to fucking die in this episode, in the first of two serious holy shit moments. If I were going to get upset about a death in this show on a metatextual level rather than just an emotional one—because there are other deaths that I’m very upset about but don’t consider bad storytelling—it would be this one. While I thought Laena’s actual death scene was really well-done, and it’s of course striking that this is a death where she has agency, in stark contrast to that of Aemma, it did feel like a but of a rush job to me. It’s also kind of convenient that she happened to have a conversation with Daemon immediately before that about how she wanted to die and how she wanted their children to be brought up. I do think this could have been drawn out a little bit more, but I think that events like this are kind of the nature of the way the show is operating, with major time-jumps between episodes.

To tackle the rest of the cast, I think John Macmillan is great, and I’ve been a big fan of Olivia Cooke for years. This is the first thing I’ve seen Emma D’Arcy do, but I think their take on the character is really interesting. In the case of both D’Arcy and Cooke, these definitely don’t feel like the same characters we’ve been watching for five previous episodes, but I think that might be deliberate. It’s striking how twisted Alicent has become compared to the victimised young girl portrayed by Emily Carey, and how passive D’Arcy’s Rhaenyra is compared to Alcock’s, but I can see how that could happen to these people after ten years of power games and parenthood.

Speaking of parenthood, let’s talk about those kids. We didn’t really get to know Rhaenyra’s that well—Jace probably did the most, but I don’t know if I got a strong (haha, STRONG) sense of who the two older boys were and how they were differentiated from one another. In the case of Alicent’s children, I think we got a lot more information. I’m not a big fan of Aegon so far—I mean, he seems like a pretty normal teenage boy, but my experiences with normal teenage boys have not been overwhelmingly positive. I’ve heard rumblings of spoilers about Aemond’s character trajectory, though I’ve been trying to avoid them, but at this point I actually think he’s a much more sympathetic character than his brother. As someone who was bullied at that age myself, I really felt for him and the way he was ganged up on by the other boys, though I absolutely think Aegon was the ringleader and I don’t really blame the Strong boys for it.

Then there’s Helaena. WHAT is going on there? I mean, she’s clearly coded neurodivergent, which I think is interesting, and Alicent’s attempts to connect with her are actually quite touching, but—and again, this is largely gleaned from spoilers I picked up on the subreddit, which I have now left—it seems like she may have some kind of psychic ability? I know this is something which somewhat runs in the Targaryen family, so it’ll be interesting to see how that develops.

Last but not least, the Dragon Twins, Baela and Rhaena (possibly not actual twins in the show). We don’t know much about Baela yet, but we know that Rhaena’s dragon egg didn’t hatch and that she feels overlooked by her father, though we have seen Daemon interact with the kids in a way that suggests he’s affectionate towards them, as he was towards their mother.

Like Rhaenyra, Daemon seemed muted this week, and I think that maybe that’s a reflection of the fact that they’ve been apart for so long. It seems like they’ve both been avoiding Dragonstone since the previous episode, and of course these two characters very much echo one another. They’ve both married Velaryon siblings and settled into marriages that fall on the contented but passionless end of the spectrum—though I think Daemon’s is by far the more successful of the two, and he and Laena wouldn’t have been a bad match at all if he weren’t hung up on Rhaenyra. While Daemon perhaps doesn’t love Laena as much as Viserys loved Aemma, it’s obviously very significant that when he’s offered the same option as his brother was, of sacrificing his wife to potentially save his unborn child, he not only refuses but doesn’t even seem to be tempted. Sure, Daemon’s under much less pressure than Viserys was to produce a male heir, but I think it does demonstrate that—for all his many flaws—Daemon isn’t as enmeshed in the heteropatriarchy as Viserys is, and I think we saw that in episode four too. Also, if Daemon had wanted to dispose of his wife, this would have been a very convenient way to do it without any blame being attached to him, and that he didn’t take that way out of the marriage—unlike in the previous episode where he actively murdered his first wife—shows that there was genuine affection and respect between the two of them.

I’ve talked about Laena’s death from a couple of different angles now, so I want to talk about the other two very shocking deaths in this episode. We lost our Strong men, Lyonel and Harwin, the two unproblematic kings of Hot D. Let me say this: I will never forgive that rat bastard Larys for this. Speaking of people I’ll never forgive, I was never the biggest fan of Criston anyway, but it turns out he’s the absolute fucking worst.

All right, I’m going to leave it at that for now, partly because [Seinfeld audio clip: “George is getting upset!”] but also because I originally was intending to put an episode out at the mid-season point, prior to episode six, but then I left it so late I thought I might as well wait until the next episode had come out, and if I wait any longer this time I might as well wait until Monday, and then I’ll probably keep procrastinating until next weekend and so on ad infinitum. I’ll probably do another one of these after episode ten. As always you can follow me on Letterboxd at panickyintheuk or email me at panickyintheuk at gmail.com. All right, until next time, valar morghulis.

House of the Dragon vs Rings of Power

The following is a transcript of the latest episode of my film & TV podcast Panicky Pictures.

___

Just a note that I’ll be discussing scenes of graphic violence, including sexual violence, in the Game of Thrones franchise in this episode. There will also be spoilers for Game of Thrones, House of the Dragon and Rings of Power, including some discussion of fan speculation about future story developments.

So, framing this as a competition isn’t necessarily an approach I would ordinarily have chosen, but it definitely seems as if the two shows are playing up a rivalry, with the first episode of House of the Dragon being dropped for free just as Rings of Power was premiering. The comparisons are obvious: they’re both high-budget high fantasy prequels to beloved and very successful IP, they both have female protagonists, and of course they both have a lot of long blonde hair. I think that the fan and media response is also playing into the competition, though maybe it’ll settle down once both shows have had more of a chance to establish themselves.

Both are obviously trying to capitalise on the gigantic cultural phenomenon that was Game of Thrones. While of course the Lord of the Rings films were a sensation, I doubt Rings of Power would have been made—let alone been the most expensive TV show ever—if Thrones hadn’t come first, especially after the muted reception given to the Hobbit films. Everybody wants their own Game of Thrones, including Netflix with The Witcher, and while all of these shows are doing pretty well (though House of the Dragon‘s ratings are eclipsing those of Rings of Power at the moment), I think that they miss the point that Game of Thrones was so popular because it filled a niche. Now the market’s flooded with a glut of high fantasy, and that’s going to create diminishing returns. I think networks and streamers would be much better off identifying a new gap in the market and trying to address that rather than trying to recreate something we’ve already seen. I’m looking forward to the Horizon: Zero Dawn show, for example. Horizon certainly has elements in common with these shows but with a unique setting and leaning more sci-fi, getting out of the quasi-medieval Europe rut that mainstream fantasy is stuck in.

My feelings about Game of Thrones are definitely more of a bell curve than my feelings about Lord of the Rings. At its best I was passionate about it, and at its worst I passionately hated it. I’m definitely not an apologist for the final two or even three seasons. As far as Lord of the Rings goes, I was about the right age for the film trilogy when it first came out and I did enjoy it, though I never fawned over the elves like my straight female friends all seemed to. When the Hobbit films came out, I went to see them and I actually really enjoyed them. I acknowledge the structural issues, and it’s a shame they weren’t able to use more practical effects, but I certainly don’t share the hatred for them that seems to be the majority opinion.

Originally, I was prepared to watch Rings of Power but give House of the Dragon a miss. I didn’t have a lot of goodwill to spare for another Thrones project. But when I started to see some of the discussion online, I decided I wanted to check out the first episode just to get some idea of what everyone was talking about. What I’m primarily referring to here is the talk about the “violence against women” in the first episode. I assumed that this was going to be a scene of sexual violence, given Game of Thrones‘ pretty terrible track record in that area.

To recap, there are at least two scenes of sexual violence in Game of Thrones which have extremely questionable framing. One is a scene of Sansa being raped which is framed through Theon’s subjectivity, as if he’s the real victim of the scene for being made to watch. It’s actually not a graphic scene at all, and I think that perhaps by panning away from the actual act of violence the showrunners meant to be sensitive, but just didn’t quite think through the implications. Another scene, and to my mind the worse one, was one where Jaime rapes Cersei after the death of their son. In a subsequent interview, the showrunners said they thought it was clear that it… became consensual by the end? Which, first of all, not really how consent works, but also definitely not how the scene came across. I think what really bothered people about this scene was how it seemed to undermine Jaime’s character growth. In both cases, I feel like it wasn’t so much the depiction of sexual violence per se as the approach that was a problem.

When I watched the pilot episode of House of the Dragon after seeing these critiques of it, I was bracing myself for a rape scene that never came. The scene that people were actually referring to was a caesarian. It’s a procedure that—within the setting, as it was for much of real-life history—is lethal to the person giving birth. King Viserys, played by Paddy Considine, chooses to sacrifice his wife, played by a fantastic Sian Brooke, in the hopes of saving his unborn son. When I realised that this was what people had been talking about, I couldn’t believe it. Here’s the thing: the show makes crystal clear right from the very first scene that this is going to be a story about the role of women in a patriarchal society, far more than Game of Thrones ever was. This scene shows us Eve Best’s Rhaenys being passed over for succession. It probably shouldn’t have been a surprise to me that some people lacked the media literacy to put this together, but I keep getting my hopes up about the human race. Always a mistake.

You sometimes see people saying things like, you can do anything you want in fantasy—why replicate sexism, or racism, or whatever other form of bigotry they’re bothered by in a work of fiction. Of course, if you prefer utopian, escapist fantasy, there’s nothing wrong with that preference, but accusing anything that engages with bigotry of itself being bigoted is nonsense. Fantasy doesn’t have an obligation to be utopian, and the Game of Thrones franchise has never billed itself as utopian. I also want to point out that, as is often the case, the violence perpetrated against a woman here is very much balanced with violence perpetrated against numerous men, including a graphic castration scene. Would it really be more feminist to demand that the ladies be immune from the danger that is ever-present in the show’s setting?

I’ve also seen someone claiming that it’s interesting that people seem to prefer the show that replicates the patriarchy to the one that’s moved beyond it. I’m not really sure that stands up to scrutiny for a couple of reasons. First of all, I don’t think that engaging with misogyny is less feminist than imagining that it doesn’t exist, though both are obviously fine if that’s what you’re going for. Secondly, I don’t think Rings has moved beyond the patriarchy? While female characters are fairly central in most of the storylines, none of them is really in a position of authority. Galadriel is constantly having her authority undermined, both by the male elves under her command and by the King, and arguably even by Elrond. Bronwyn faces similar challenges in her own community, being ignored by the male community leaders. Dwarf society is clearly patriarchal, with a male head of state just as the elves have. The Harfoots seem to be a bit less heirarchical, but it still seems as if most of the community leaders are male. There’s a difference between having forceful female characters and depicting them actually having societal power. So I’m not sure I buy that dichotomy being imposed on the two shows; I think, if anything, House of the Dragon is just more explicit about its themes and ideology, whereas Rings is so far a bit flimsier in that regard.

I want to move on to another couple of things I’ve been seeing on the cesspool that is twitter. First of all, a lot of stuff about Matt Smith’s physical appearance: stuff like how he’s ugly, he looks bad in the wig, he has no eyebrows, he LOOKS like a product of incest. It kind of feels like this is beneath my contempt and I shouldn’t even dignify it with a response, but I do just want to say that I love Matt Smith and I think he’s terrific in this. Also, Jack Gleeson had to deal with similar stuff, but I think it was worse in his case since he was so young and right at the beginning of his career, as well as because Joffrey was an even more hated character, at least so far. It’s just revolting behaviour from fans and I hate the fact that anyone in my twitter circle would be spreading it onto my timeline. I do think some people have come around after the end of episode three showcased Smith, and Daemon, in a way that they found acceptably badass, but it’s kind of pathetic that a character has to single-handedly kill a bunch of people before fans will give the actor the respect he deserves.

Another thing I want to mention is a tweet I saw comparing real-life monarch King Charles II of Spain with Daenerys Targaryen as portrayed by Emilia Clarke. The point of the tweet seems to be that she is more inbred than he is, but she’s hot whereas he is disabled slash ugly, so in real life she’d probably be disabled slash ugly too. I mean, in real life would she be able to ride dragons and withstand being set on fire? I usually hate that kind of argument, and I’m not saying the logic of fantasy shouldn’t be internally consistent, but in this case I just don’t understand what point is being made. It really seems like an excuse to make fun of a real-life disabled man. And by the way, one of the replies to this tweet—which was liked by TWO of the people I follow, which is how I saw it, and that’s disappointing—listed one of Charlie’s disabilities as SHORT. As someone who’s five foot three, which is the same height as Prince fuck you very much, that’s neither a disability nor a result of inbreeding, not that I want to stigmatise being either disabled or the product of incest for what it’s worth. God, I just think this whole thing is gross. What are you getting at with this? Are you worried that the Game of Thrones franchise is going to turn kids on to incest and you’re trying to warn them? Because this discourse really feels like a hair’s breadth away from eugenics to me, and even if you think that’s a stretch, it’s definitely using a real-life disabled man to make a fatuous point about a fictional character, which to me is gross enough by itself. Let’s not forget that everybody’s favourite spouter of soundbites Tyrion Lannister was also—horror of horrors—short. So that’s what I have to say about that. Okay, moving on.

As for what I think about Hot D more generally, I’m really enjoying it. I have seen criticisms that it would be stronger with multiple plot threads rather than purely focusing on the Targaryens, but I have to say that so far the main plot has been enough to keep my interest. I think the characters are well-drawn, and the battle scene in the third episode was a huge improvement on some of the ones we saw in Game of Thrones, both leaner and better choreographed and edited. There have also been some scenes that had real emotional heft, like the one with Nova Foueillis-Mosé’s Laena Valaryon being groomed as the next queen, just as Emily Carey’s Alicent is by her own father. Both girls’ obvious anxiety and lack of agency is really affecting, as is another scene between Alicent and Milly Alcock’s Princess Rhaenyra as they talk about the loss of their mothers. All three of these young actors are really impressive, whereas I think that in Game of Thrones the younger cast was a bit of a mixed bag. I feel like House of the Dragon is generally more interested in the interiority of its characters than Game of Thrones tended to be, and at the moment at least, that’s paying off.

I also think that the show is using the dragons really well. There’s an early shot which is a clever mirror to a shot from the finale of Game of Thrones, and which implies that dragons are going to be treated as much more commonplace here, but actually, I think the show creates a real sense of awe in scenes like the one where Rhaenyra arrives at Dragonstone to speak with her uncle. The dragons are used sparingly, but when they do show up, it makes an impression.

I just discovered that the setting and main conflict, like much of Martin’s work, was inspired by a real-life period of British history known as “the Anarchy”. King Henry the first’s only legitimate son drowned in 1120, after which Henry chose his daughter Matilda as his successor, but she was challenged by her cousin Stephen. Matilda was known as Empress Matilda, and her son—who would eventually go on to become king—was known as Henry FitzEmpress. How cool is that? This period is also the backdrop for the Cadfael novels, which surely deserve their own sprawling high-budget franchise.

One last point I want to make before I move on to Rings of Power is that I think that Lady Mysaria, played by Sonoya Mizuno, feels like a departure from the way sex workers have been portrayed in the franchise up to this point. We’ve seen compelling sex worker characters such as Roz and Shae, but they haven’t always been treated with a lot of dignity. Shae was very much seen from Tyrion’s perspective, and his eventual murder of her didn’t seem to have any effect on the popularity of his character among the fanbase. Roz was dispatched in even grislier fashion. Both of these women seemed mostly to exist to serve the storylines of characters who were deemed more important, like Sansa and Tyrion. While this may end up being the case with Mysaria, I think it’s interesting that in her introductory scene, we seemed to be seeing her point of view more than Daemon’s. We haven’t seen a huge amount of her since then, but in one key scene we got a lot of backstory and a sense of her motivations in a way that feels promising. I’m looking forward to seeing what happens with these characters, and what the older set of actors who are due to show up mid-season will bring to the table. The show has already been renewed for a second season, but one of the showrunners Miguel Sapochnik has stepped down and will be replaced with Alan Taylor. Ryan Condal is still attached, who was an EP and writer for the underrated sci-fi show Colony, and Taylor is a veteran not only of Game of Thrones but also of a ton of great shows like Mad Men and The Sopranos, whereas Sapochnik was responsible for ‘The Long Night’ and several other season 8 episodes, as well as one of the absolute worst Fringe episodes ‘Alone in the World’, so… I’m not too worried, to be honest, but we’ll see what happens.

Okay, let’s talk about Rings of Power. I have to say that my watch of the first episode didn’t bode well. I was really having to force myself to finish it. I think that’s largely because I was really struggling to engage with Galadriel’s storyline. It’s a shame, because I’m a big fan of Morfydd Clark—I haven’t seen Saint Maud, because it looked too scary, but I loved her in His Dark Materials and A Personal History of David Copperfield. I have to confess that I’m not really an elf person. I’m willing to be corrected on this, but I feel like being into elves is kind of straight culture? As I said, I’ve had two friends who were really into the elves in Lord of the Rings, and they were both straight women. Maybe that sample size is too small to really conclude anything. But it doesn’t stop at Tolkien, for me. I’m really into Bioware games, and Dragon Age: Origins is one of my favourites, but while most of the fandom—not to mention the creators—seem to think that elves are the canon protagonists, I really prefer them in small doses. My first and favourite playthrough of Origins was as a dwarf commoner, and I’m still really attached to that character and storyline. Similarly, I’m much more interested in the dwarves in the Lord of the Rings franchise.

Unsurprisingly, then, I did find myself starting to be won over when we got to the second episode and we got to see Khazad-dûm in its prime. I think it’s really gorgeously realised, and far more impressive than all the shiny elf stuff that kind of looks like a screensaver to me. I also felt like Galadriel’s storyline got a bit more interesting in this episode.

I was looking forward to seeing Nazanin Boniadi in this show, having been a big fan of Counterpart, but so far I’m finding her storyline kind of middling. We’ve seen human-elf romances before, and I don’t know if there’s much about this one that makes it feel fresh. I also feel—and this is a wider problem throughout the show—that the characterisation isn’t great. A lot of the time it feels like the characters stand around making declamatory statements. There isn’t much subtext or nuance in a lot of the dialogue, and there isn’t much humour either. It’s always been the dwarves and the hobbits who provided that levity throughout the franchise, and since there aren’t any in the Bronwyn or Galadriel storylines, they can drag a bit for me.

Okay, so let’s talk hobbits, or rather proto-hobbits: the harfoots. Obviously there’s been some controversy among the morlock population about the fact that there’s racial diversity in this show, and I’m not even going to bother engaging with that, because it’s so stupid. I did engage with some stuff that I also found stupid when I was talking about House of the Dragon, but only because it was coming from people who profess to be on the left and I feel like they should know better. I’m not going to sit here and tell you that racism is bad, I feel like we’re on the same page there. I have seen a lot of engagement with these points on social media, and I do understand the impulse to clap back, especially after the racism and harassment that some of the Star Wars cast faced in the last few years. I just don’t know if it’s really reaching the people who need to hear it, so it can start to feel like a bit of a circle jerk after a while—not to mention that people like Elon Musk do this shit deliberately to try and cling to their notoriety, and you’re just playing into their hands by circulating it. So let’s not dwell on that.

I did see one tweet that said that the true Tolkien fans are the ones who are complaining that the dwarrowdams don’t have beards. I don’t sell myself as a true Tolkien fan, since I’ve learned most of the lore through participating in the fandom rather than actually reading the books, but I did totally think this! Honestly, it kind of bothered me! I mean, I’ve made peace with it, but it would have been cooler if they’d had beards. Never mind.

Anyway, the harfoots are by far the best thing about the show for me so far, and I love that they’re Irish, even though the convincingness of their accents is… variable. I think Markella Kavenagh and Megan Richards are both really promising, and their dynamic is sort of reminiscent of the one between Frodo and Sam, but it’s also its own thing. Of course, the crux of this storyline is the mysterious Meteor Man, aka the Stranger. Who is he? There are a lot of fan theories floating around. While I was actually watching, my guess was that he was Tom Bombadil, and that is one of the theories, but on reflection I think there are two others which are a lot more likely. The first is that he’s either Gandalf—though that would definitely involve some jiggery-pokery with the timeline—or one of the other Istar (or is it Ishtar? My Quenya is rusty). If he is Gandalf, his bond with Nori would foreshadow the relationship he later has with Hobbits, his fall would foreshadow his death and rebirth at the hands of the Balrog, and Daniel Weyman does have enough of the look of a young Ian McKellan for it to work.

The second most plausible theory, to me, is that he’s Sauron himself. This would fit in with what looked like the Eye of Sauron at the crash site when he landed, plus the fact that Nori says the fire around him is cold. Cold fire is always a bad sign in this franchise, from that torches that gave off no heat in episode one to the Ring being “quite cool” to the touch when Gandalf takes it out of the fire in Fellowship.

Then again, there’s another theory about Sauron, and that’s that he’s Halbrand, the man on the raft with Galadriel. I’m not convinced that there’s a huge amount of evidence for this so far, but it’s entirely possible, and that would free up our friend Meteor Man to either be a wizard or Tom Bombadil, which is still my favourite theory, even though it’s not the most likely one.

So, while I definitely prefer House of the Dragon so far, Rings of Power is growing on me. My hope is that it lightens up a little bit, that we get plenty more of the dwarves and the Harfoots, and that the dialogue improves. Then again, as I said, the dialogue so far is in keeping with the franchise—I just could do with a bit more wit. I’ll keep watching both, at least for now.